Since the housing bust began, the banks have largely controlled the inventory of homes on the MLS. At first, they flooded the MLS with subprime foreclosures, but with mark-to-fantasy accounting, they were able to slow their foreclosure rates and store delinquent borrowers in shadow inventory. Since early 2009, the number of properties available for sales has been completely controlled by the banks. They determine when to list their standing inventory of REO, and they control the approval on every short sale. Between those two sources, the banks control the market.
Banks decided early this year to slow the rate they took back properties at foreclose auctions thus reducing MLS inventory of REO significantly. More recently banks increased foreclosures 30% as their REO pipeline stabilizes, but this supply is still several months away. Plus, they also slowed their rate of new filings which suggests they don’t plan to increase inventory significantly. Hopefully, the upsurge in banks taking on REO will translate into more available MLS inventory soon. It’s too early to tell if this is a new trend signalling a change in policy.
The banks benefit from the lack of inventory. Buyers bid up the prices on what’s available, and the banks recover more capital from their bad loans. The only caveat is that banks aren’t able to sell that many or prices would crumble again, so by restricting supply and raising prices, they slow the rate of their liquidations. It’s their hope that rising prices will trigger a self-fueling price rally as sidelined buyers enter the market for fear of being priced out. It likely won’t work out that way.
Many sidelined buyers are smart. They are waiting because they know lenders have an enormous shadow inventory they must liquidate, and in many markets, lenders have lost control of their liquidations and drove prices much lower. When buyers know the product is there, they also know they have the upper hand. If they wait, they can generally get a better deal. Most sidelined buyers today are frustrated by the lack of currently available inventory, but they are also being patient and waiting for lenders to pick up the pace of their liquidations. In the meantime, inventory levels are dropping to very low levels, particularly in the western US.
By Nick Timiraos — September 18, 2012, 6:00 AM
The number of homes listed for sale fell in August, led by a clutch of California cities that posted outsized declines.
Active Inventory in Irvine hit the lowest level of at least the last six years. (chart courtesy of Irvine Housing Blog)
Inventories fell in August by 1.2% from July, bucking a seasonal pattern of a slight uptick before the summer season ends. Listings were down by 18.7% from one year ago and 34.1% from two years ago, according to a report from Realtor.com.
Falling inventories are a leading driver behind the recent rally in home prices, and the declines point to continued price-strength in many parts of the Western U.S., which are also benefiting from strong investor demand.
Investor demand is confined to only a small subset of the property market. The real story behind the rising prices is the lack of supply.
Among the 15 cities with the largest year-over-year declines, some 13 were in California, led by Oakland, which posted a 58.4% decline. Other big declines came in Stockton (down 45%), Fresno (down 43.1%), Sacramento (down 42.4%), Riverside-San Bernardino (down 41.8%), Bakersfield (down 41.4%), and San Jose (down 41.1%).
The decline in active listings across Orange County is remarkable.
Inventory declines have typically preceded stronger prices if demand stays the same, because more buyers are chasing fewer homes. But low inventory could also curb transaction volumes if buyers, frustrated by the lack of choice, sit on the sidelines. …
Many frustrated buyers are sitting on the sidelines. As a result, we may not see a decline in price this winter, and if inventory returns, sales volumes may remain relatively high as unsatisfied buyers from the prime selling season remain active this fall and winter.
The bank wants to make money on this one
This property was purchased for $475,000 on 4/22/2002 with a no-money down loan. She refinanced with a $535,000 first mortgage on 6/7/2005, and on 6/14/2006 she got a $89,000 stand-alone second. She got her $150K.
The first mortgage holder blew out the second mortgage at foreclosure and took the property back for $514,538. I’m surprised the second lien holder didn’t bid the property up to get back some of their capital. Based on the current asking price — a price they may get in this market — the banks stands to make money on the foreclosure.
So far the banks have been losing money on most of their bad loans, so the cries of predatory lending have been muted. What happens when they start making money on these deals? Will we tolerate banks making money on their foreclosures? Not that there’s anything we can really do about it…
Wouldn't you be embarrassed to overpay by $100,000? Only fools buy houses without knowing neighborhood values. Don't be a fool. Don't suffer the pain of an underwater mortgage. The surest way to lose your house is to overpay for it. Our reports identify overvalued and undervalued neighborhoods. Use it to broaden or narrow your search area. Savvy buyers work with us to find bargains. We've saved thousands from financial ruin. Let us save you too. If you want peace of mind while shopping for your next home, sign up for our monthly market newsletter.
Proprietary OC Housing News home purchase analysis
$689,900 …….. Asking Price
$475,000 ………. Purchase Price
4/22/2002 ………. Purchase Date
$214,900 ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($38,000) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
$176,900 ………. Net Gain (Loss)
45.2% ………. Gross Percent Change
37.2% ………. Net Percent Change
3.6% ………… Annual Appreciation
Cost of Home Ownership
$689,900 …….. Asking Price
$137,980 ………… 20% Down Conventional
3.53% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$551,920 …….. Mortgage
$126,116 ………. Income Requirement
$2,488 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$598 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$172 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$0 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$0 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
$3,258 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
($389) ………. Tax Savings
($864) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$156 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$192 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
$2,353 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
$8,399 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$8,399 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$5,519 ………… Interest Points
$137,980 ………… Down Payment
$160,297 ………. Total Cash Costs
$36,000 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
$196,297 ………. Total Savings Needed
The property above is available for sale on the MLS.Contact us for a comparative market analysis, a cost of ownership analysis, or information on how you can make an offer today!
9731 South EL GRECO Cir
5 bd / 3.75 ba
2,330 Sq. Ft.
16889 HELENA Cir
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,412 Sq. Ft.
16542 APPLE St
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,454 Sq. Ft.
9922 DAHLIA Cir
4 bd / 2 ba
2,000 Sq. Ft.
16583 TEAK Cir
5 bd / 3 ba
2,145 Sq. Ft.
9460 ANDALUSIA Ave
4 bd / 3.5 ba
2,875 Sq. Ft.
15740 POINSETTIA Way
4 bd / 2.75 ba
2,465 Sq. Ft.
8842 SHAPPHIRE Ave
3 bd / 2 ba
2,645 Sq. Ft.
15861 LAS SOLANAS St
4 bd / 2 ba
2,101 Sq. Ft.
8598 CAPE CANAVERAL Ave
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,950 Sq. Ft.