In a recent post, I noted that FHA mortgage delinquencies skyrocketed more than 25%. Since most FHA borrowers only put 3.5% down, when factoring in a 6% commission, 2% closing costs, and a declining market, nearly all FHA borrowers over the last five years are effectively underwater. When these borrowers sell or quit paying, the losses will be huge because the capital recovery will be far less than the original loan balance. With a 9.4% serious delinquency rate, the FHA is facing 713,104 future foreclosures. This rate has been rising steadily, and many more delinquencies are coming because many borrowers will want to move before prices regain peak values. Many borrowers may opt for a strategic short sale or strategic default, after all, they don’t have much skin in the game, so it’s easy for them to walk away. The FHA insurance fund has far less in reserve than its federal mandate, and many observers are concerned a bailout of the FHA is inevitable.
To avoid a federal bailout, the fund must be replenished quickly with user fees. To this end, the FHA recently raised the fee it charges at origination and the fee for ongoing insurance. Even these measures may not be enough. To raise more money, the FHA must abandon its mandate to provide loans to low and moderate income borrowers and tap into the market for high wage earners. After the fund stabilizes, the conforming limit for FHA loans can be lowered again and the FHA can return to exclusively making loans for low to moderate income borrowers.
In 2008, the conforming limit for both GSE and FHA loans was raised from $417,000 to $729,750 as non-insured private financing evaporated. In late 2011, the conforming loan limit for high income areas like Orange County or the San Francisco Bay area was lowered on GSE loans from $729,750 to $625,000. What perplexed many at the time was that the conforming limit for FHA loans was not similarly reduced. Why did the government do this? They too recognized the need to get high wage earners into the fund.
Ever since the change, many of Shevy’s clients faced the cost of financing dilemma this change creates. If the borrower uses a $625,000 GSE-backed loan, even with less than 20% down and private mortgage insurance, the cost of ownership is significantly less (PMI is half of the FHA insurance fee). The cost of the incremental dollars when the borrower goes from $625,000 to $729,750 with less than 20% down is significant (nearly $500 per month) because the FHA insurance is much higher. The borrower pays the extra money into the FHA insurance fund. Anywhere high wage earners are using FHA loans — and many are — the FHA is getting a considerable revenue boost.
Think about what would happen if the GSE conforming limit were reduced back to $417,000 and the FHA limit were maintained at $729,750. Anyone putting less than 20% down on a house between $450,000 and $750,000 — which is a huge portion of the coastal markets in California and New England — would be pushed into FHA loans. If these markets really have bottomed — and that’s a big “if” — these new high wage earning borrowers would not cause large losses, and the increase in FHA insurance payments would be dramatic.
Further, if the conforming loan limit on GSE loans were reduced, it would also help reduce the size of their operations and make it easier to someday dismantle them. As long as the GSEs are insuring more than half the housing market, there is no way we can reform or eliminate them.
Lowering the GSE conforming loan limit will significantly increase FHA insurance fund revenues while simultaneously reducing the footprint of the GSEs. Don’t be surprised if you see this happen sometime soon. If politicians don’t do something like this, they will have to bail the FHA out, and none of them want to face that problem.
The FHA never insured Option ARMs
- The former owner of today’s featured property purchased on 11/13/1993 using a $495,000 using a $396,000 first mortgage and a $99,000 down payment.
- On 6/16/2004 they refinanced with a $446,000 first mortgage.
- On 12/17/2004 they refinanced with a $576,000 first mortgage.
- On 9/16/2005 they obtained a $568,000 Option ARM with a 1% teaser rate and a $75,000 HELOC.
- Assuming they maxed out their HELOC, the total mortgage equity withdrawal was $247,000 including their down payment.
The defaulted in early 2009 and were foreclosed on in early 2011, so they only got to squat for two years. $247,000 in free money and two years squatting isn’t impressive by Orange County standards, but it was still a good take for them.
Wouldn't you be embarrassed to overpay by $100,000? Only fools buy houses without knowing neighborhood values. Don't be a fool. Don't suffer the pain of an underwater mortgage. The surest way to lose your house is to overpay for it. Our reports identify overvalued and undervalued neighborhoods. Use it to broaden or narrow your search area. Savvy buyers work with us to find bargains. We've saved thousands from financial ruin. Let us save you too. If you want peace of mind while shopping for your next home, sign up for our monthly market newsletter.
We're sorry, but we couldn't find MLS # S706437 in our database. This property may be a new listing or possibly taken off the market. Please check back again.
Proprietary OC Housing News home purchase analysis
$485,000 …….. Asking Price
$495,000 ………. Purchase Price
10/13/2003 ………. Purchase Date
($10,000) ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($39,600) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
($49,600) ………. Net Gain (Loss)
-2.0% ………. Gross Percent Change
-10.0% ………. Net Percent Change
-0.2% ………… Annual Appreciation
Cost of Home Ownership
$485,000 …….. Asking Price
$16,975 ………… 3.5% Down FHA Financing
3.55% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$468,025 …….. Mortgage
$121,697 ………. Income Requirement
$2,115 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$420 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$121 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$488 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$0 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
$3,144 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays
($316) ………. Tax Savings
($730) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$19 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$141 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
$2,258 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership
Cash Acquisition Demands
$6,350 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$6,350 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$4,680 ………… Interest Points
$16,975 ………… Down Payment
$34,355 ………. Total Cash Costs
$34,600 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
$68,955 ………. Total Savings Needed
The property above is available for sale on the MLS.Contact us for a comparative market analysis, a cost of ownership analysis, or information on how you can make an offer today!
OC Housing News FREE Guides!
Click on the book cover for more information.
Nearby ForeclosuresGain a competitive advantage over other buyers. By locating distressed properties -- before they hit the MLS -- you can discover where tomorrow's REOs and short sales will appear. Most of these properties are not listed on the MLS, but they will be soon. Research properties in advance and get a jump on your competition. Don't miss out on another deal because you couldn't act quickly. Use this tool to your advantage! The red properties are already bank owned. As soon as REO asset managers prepare them for sale, they will be on the MLS. Get ready! The green and blue properties have owners who are not paying their mortgages. They may be offered as short sales, or they may go through foreclosure and become REO. Either way, they will also likely be available on the MLS soon. Find your next home! Be prepared to offer on these properties by researching them in advance or risk losing out to buyers who are have done their homework. Start your research today! To find distressed properties, enter your desired location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."
1501 CARRIAGE Dr
5 bd / 3 ba
2,479 Sq. Ft.
1605 West CARRIAGE Dr
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,156 Sq. Ft.
1916 West WEST WIND
3 bd / 2 ba
2,000 Sq. Ft.
3088 PLATTE Dr
5 bd / 3 ba
2,358 Sq. Ft.
2901 South CENTER St
4 bd / 3.25 ba
2,453 Sq. Ft.
3144 COOLIDGE Ave
3 bd / 2.5 ba
2,397 Sq. Ft.