The OC Great Park may have lost its funding

The Orange County Great Park located on the El Toro airbase in Irvine is running out of money. The main source of development money was to be the development of the residential properties which have been delayed due to the housing bubble. Now the other source of funding, redevelopment agency funds, has been wiped out by governor Jerry Brown. With no cash coming in, it’s hard to see how this project goes forward.

Money Woes: What’s a Great Park To Do?

Posted: Monday, January 9, 2012 6:42 am | Updated: 5:42 am, Tue Jan 10, 2012. ADAM ELMAHREK

The Orange County Great Park’s chance of losing its primary funding is more likely now that the California Supreme Court has backed up Gov. Jerry Brown’s move to eliminate redevelopment agencies.

The decision has sent cities throughout the state scrambling, but few have as much to lose as Irvine.

The 1,300-acre metropolitan park is by far Orange County’s largest redevelopment project. Master designer Ken Smith envisioned, among other amenities, a canyon, a wildlife corridor and a man-made lake.

A city memo released last year estimated that the governor’s plan could eliminate $1.4 billion — possibly much more — in tax increment revenue for the park.

The Great Park sits atop the 4,700-acre Marine Corps Air Station El Toro, which was shuttered in 1999 as part of the nationwide Base Realignment and Closure program. Great Park CEO Mike Ellzey has described transforming military bases like El Toro as nearly impossible tasks without redevelopment.

“Otherwise how does it happen? How can it possibly happen?” Ellzey said last year. “It’s hugely challenging.”

Without funding, it doesn’t happen. If the redeveloment agency funds are truly gone, this project is in real trouble.

State legislators from Orange County are looking for a solution, and park and city leaders seem confident that they will find one. But legislators are not guaranteeing a fix. There are no solid alternatives in place if redevelopment revenue disappears.

“I think we’re OK, and how we proceed with what tools and at what pace is a conversation that will continue to unfold,” said Beth Krom, an Irvine City Council member and chairwoman of the park’s board of directors.

She added that there have been no “officials discussions” regarding alternatives to build the park.

Will this reopen the idea of the airbase becoming an airport?

Construction of the park has been dependent upon revenue generated by the adjacent development of nearly 5,000 homes. The plan, a typical redevelopment agency strategy, was to fund the park with tax increments, the increase in property tax revenue projected to come from the housing development.

The park is already short of cash. Total expenditures for this fiscal year are projected at nearly $20 million, but revenues, which come from sources like land leases, are estimated at just over $9 million, according to budget documents. The park’s fund balance at the end of the fiscal year is projected to be $10.7 million.

Other funding sources are being considered, though it is unclear whether they will even come close to the amount that would be generated by a redevelopment area.

They have extorted all they can get out of the developers. With land values down 30% or more from the peak, private investment is not going to fill the void.

The park’s board last year approved a contract with San Francisco-based Strada Investment Group to generate public-private partnership deals to produce new revenue for the park. That $25,000-per-month contract was criticized by Councilman Jeffrey Lalloway because it never went out to bid.

The Orange County Register reported last year that park leaders were mulling over the sale of public land to help pay for the park.

Selling off some land is the only viable alternative. But what land, and what land uses will occur there? Are they selling land with entitlements to build more houses? How would that impact their Environmental Impact Report?

Councilman Larry Agran has also been urging Great Park Neighborhoods developer Heritage Fields and the local school district to relocate a planned high school next to the park. Park leaders then might tap state money for sports facilities to be used by both the high school and the park. The City Council is scheduled to discuss the possible relocation Tuesday.

The message from park leaders that they have no alternative plans contrasts sharply with statements Agran made last year. Agran, a former chairman of the park’s board of directors, told Los Angeles Times columnist Jim Newton that the board had both a “plan B and a plan C” should the ax fall on redevelopment.

Agran never specified those plans, and other board members said they didn’t have any knowledge of such alternatives. Agran didn’t return a phone call from Voice of OC seeking clarification.

They won’t discuss plan B until plan A is a total failure. That’s how politicians work.

State legislators are proposing a bill that would extend the Feb. 1 deadline for cities to dissolve their redevelopment agencies, the first step in a wider legislative strategy to replace redevelopment with a new program, according to Tony Cardenas, regional public affairs manager for the Orange County division of the League of California Cities.

“If that deadline transpires and there’s no new mechanism, then redevelopment will just cease to exist, period,” Cardenas said.

There is hope that the Legislature will work something out with the governor, because so many affordable housing programs in the state will be severely hobbled by the elimination of redevelopment.

“Keeping economic development as a tool for cities is very important, as is to help cities develop affordable housing,” said Assemblyman Jose Solorio (D-Santa Ana).

Cities don’t need new affordable housing programs. The housing bubble has taken care of that. Housing in most areas is affordable now.

There is a consensus among supporters and critics of redevelopment that military base conversions aren’t prone to some faults of other redevelopment projects. Eminent domain, the legal process by which governments forcibly acquire private property, is one tool that isn’t a factor in redeveloping military bases.

“I would hope that we use this opportunity to fix the significant problems with redevelopment — the eminent domain overreaches that redevelopment agencies and and cities were guilty of,” said Assemblyman Don Wagner, (R-Irvine). “But I don’t want to shut down opportunities to, for example, recondition bases up and down the state.”

Will new ideas to salvage certain redevelopment tools include a special funding source for rehabilitating military bases? Solorio says it hasn’t been part of early discussions, but he also said that military bases would be “in the mix.”

Please contact Adam Elmahrek directly at aelmahrek@voiceofoc.org and follow him on Twitter: twitter.com/adamelmahrek.

This is a huge problem, and the future development plans of the Orange County Great Park may have to be completely redone.

Huge down payment lost

The peak buyer of today’s featured property paid $770,000 on 1/24/2005. They used a $450,000 first mortgage and a $320,000 down payment. They may have recovered part of their down payment with a $97,500 HELOC they got on 2/20/2007, but they lost at least $222,250.

The owners defaulted in mid 2010, and they got to squat for about a year and a half. It doesn’t make up for the huge lost down payment.

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 08/12/2011

Document Type: Notice of Default

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 01/06/2011

Document Type: Notice of Sale

Foreclosure Record

Recording Date: 09/30/2010

Document Type: Notice of Default

The Schools First Federal Credit Union bought the property on 11/8/2011 and quickly got it on the market. If they get their asking price, they may make a profit, but since they are asking nearly peak purchase price, I doubt they get it.

– —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- —- –

---

For more Irvine news, market analysis and property profiles, please see the Irvine Housing News.

---

Proprietary Irvine Housing News home purchase analysis

18 HIDDEN Brk Irvine, CA 92602

$735,000 …….. Asking Price
$770,000 ………. Purchase Price
1/24/2005 ………. Purchase Date

($35,000) ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($61,600) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
($96,600) ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
-4.5% ………. Gross Percent Change
-12.5% ………. Net Percent Change
-0.7% ………… Annual Appreciation

Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$735,000 …….. Asking Price
$147,000 ………… 20% Down Conventional
3.95% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$588,000 …….. Mortgage
$143,653 ………. Income Requirement

$2,790 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$637 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$100 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$184 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$0 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$0 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$3,711 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

($643) ………. Tax Savings
($855) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$200 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$204 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$2,617 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$8,850 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$8,850 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$5,880 ………… Interest Points
$147,000 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$170,580 ………. Total Cash Costs
$40,100 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$210,680 ………. Total Savings Needed
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
This property is available for sale via the MLS.
Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707
949.769.1599……
sales@ochousingnews.com…..

Name	*
Email	*
Phone	*

We're sorry, but we couldn't find MLS # P803383 in our database. This property may be a new listing or possibly taken off the market. Please check back again.

Competing Listings

	$699,000 28 PROCLAMATION Way		0.37 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,005 Sq. Ft.
	$950,000 11716 LOUCKS		0.38 miles 5 bd / 2.75 ba 3,000 Sq. Ft.
	$799,000 12 PROCLAMATION Way		0.38 miles 5 bd / 3 ba 2,268 Sq. Ft.
	$900,000 2605 PALMETTO		0.39 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,500 Sq. Ft.
	$849,000 11568 NITTA		0.44 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,439 Sq. Ft.
	$872,000 11535 NITTA		0.47 miles 4 bd / 2.5 ba 2,550 Sq. Ft.
	$695,000 7 THREE RIVERS		0.63 miles 3 bd / 2.5 ba 2,200 Sq. Ft.
	$759,000 11650 GOETTING Ave		0.66 miles 4 bd / 3.5 ba 2,150 Sq. Ft.
	$1,100,000 2345 PIEPER Ln		0.72 miles 3 bd / 2.5 ba 2,600 Sq. Ft.
	$838,000 12480 HIGHLAND Dr		0.86 miles 3 bd / 2 ba 2,086 Sq. Ft.

---

Wouldn't you be embarrassed to overpay by $100,000? Only fools buy houses without knowing neighborhood values. Don't be a fool. Don't suffer the pain of an underwater mortgage. The surest way to lose your house is to overpay for it. Our reports identify overvalued and undervalued neighborhoods. Use it to broaden or narrow your search area. Savvy buyers work with us to find bargains. We've saved thousands from financial ruin. Let us save you too. If you want peace of mind while shopping for your next home, sign up for our monthly market newsletter.

Name	*
Email	*
Phone	*

---

---

Sign up for short sale and REO workshop. Third Wednesday every month at 6:30 PM. Or RSVP to sales@ochousingnews.com