May 152012
 

John McMonigle fully embraced the California housing Ponzi scheme. He claims to have represented $2.1 billion in real estate transactions during the housing bubble. If he made 3% of that figure, that’s $63,000,000 in real estate commissions. In a game of financial football, that is a powerful offense. Unfortunately, his defense wasn’t quite as good.

Falling from housing peak: John McMonigle’s ride

According to bankruptcy court papers, McMonigle, 46, has amassed some $50 million in debts. His assets – even after selling his Newport Beach condo, his cars and personal effects – total $2.4 million – plus the value of the properties he owns that are facing foreclosure.

Critics say McMonigle let his ego get the best of him, that he got reckless, spent excessively and failed to see the housing market’s looming day of reckoning.

He gambled on a lavish – and perhaps impractical – lakeside palace in Newport Coast, once valued as high as $87 million. He borrowed $13.4 million to build a shiny, new office for himself near Fashion Island.

Now both properties are on the verge of foreclosure.

Making matters worse, McMonigle’s wife of 16 years filed for divorce. A week later, he filed for bankruptcy.

That is a crushing defeat. In losing his entitlements, he got to discover what he really needs.

McMonigle and his supporters maintain that the charming, soft-spoken salesman is just the latest victim of the housing slump.

McMonigle, they say, will bounce back.

I hope he does. He did a lot of thing right to get to where he was. With his ability to make money selling real estate, if he sticks to that and learns to control his spending, he could be successful again.

The Rise

John McMonigle arrived in Orange County with just $73 in his pocket in 1989.

Within four years the Oklahoma native was grossing $100,000 a year as a Newport Beach real estate agent. In 15 years, he was the top U.S. salesman in dollar terms in the Coldwell Banker chain.

That is an amazing rise. Of course, Daniel Sadek was a salesman who rose quickly too with an unsustainable business model and uncontrolled spending. He was later robbed in his Newport Beach home, then he lost it in foreclosure. I don’t see him making a big comeback, but anything is possible.

McMonigle also had branched out into high-end spec homes, and in 2003, he bought an odd-shaped, inland parcel in Newport Coast.

Soon a plan emerged for a luxury estate fit for an oil baron: The Villa del Lago property would include a three-story, 17,000-square-foot mansion, private lake, vineyard and horse stables. At one point, McMonigle’s asking price rose to $87 million.

The initial asking price was $87M, and the final sale price was $18.5M. That’s a 79% reduction in the asking price to consummate a sale. Do you think it was a bit overpriced?

Speculation about McMonigle’s finances surfaced after he sold his home in Shady Canyon in October 2008 and became a renter.

At the time, McMonigle said he and his wife wanted to build a bigger home. Now, McMonigle concedes he sold his home because he was nervous about the market.

LOL! I wonder if he was reading the old IHB. His instincts were correct. He market was due to fall, and the high end will continue to struggle for many more years to come.

Cote, who’s seen numerous real estate downturns in his 40 years, wondered if McMonigle failed to foresee this latest slump.

“I think he overreached,” Cote said. “I think he didn’t think it would come to an end.”

Pride and arrogance often precede a fall.

Another critic, luxury home salesman Mark Whitehead, maintains that McMonigle consistently overpriced his homes.

Portabello and Villa del Lago were prime examples, Whitehead said.

Portabello took 4 ½ years to sell and fetched less than half its original $75 million price tag.

Villa del Lago remains unsold even after the price fell to $37 million – a $50 million price chop.

The price would cut in half again before it finally sold.

Newport Beach Mansion, Once Listed for $57 Million, Sells at Auction

May 14, 2012, 10:07 AM

An unfinished, 16,600-square-foot mansion in Southern California once listed for $57 million has sold at auction for just $18.5 million, according to the property owners’ lawyer.

It was actually listed at $87 million, not $57 million. Could it be any more overpriced?

Located in the upscale city of Newport Beach, Calif., the mansion was last listed for $37 million before being brought to auction in the last week of April. If the deal is accepted by all parties, including the lender and a list of subcontractors, the sale will draw to a close one of the most ambitious homes to break ground in Orange County during the housing boom. The buyer has not yet been revealed.

This project illustrates just how foolish our real estate market had become. Nobody speculates on $87M mansions. The buyer pool for such a property is very, very thin. People with that kind of money are not tract home buyers. Sales of such expensive homes are generally between other very rich people who paid cash and held the property for a number of years. A speculator using financing is likely to get eaten alive by interest payments waiting for a sale — which is what happened here. Any buyer who wanted this property would be wiser to just wait until McMonigle imploded and negotiate with the bank. A buyer at this price point can afford to be patient. A financed seller cannot. This was a dumb idea at its inception.

The property includes a private lake, a horse stable and riding area, a 17-car garage, a private vineyard and a “wine cave,” among other amenities.

In 2003, well-known real-estate agent John McMonigle formed a limited partnership to buy the 12.5-acre parcel of land for $3.42 million, according to attorney Sean O’Keefe, who represents the current owners. Mr. McMonigle did not return calls for comment, and he is no longer represented by Mr. O’Keefe. Mr. McMonigle’s current attorney, Michael Nicastro, declined to comment on the sale.

To build the colossal eight-bedroom, 17-bathroom estate, the partnership took out several loans against the property, including a $21.6 million loan in 2007 from La Jolla Bank, according to court records. The Wall Street Journal has reported that La Jolla Bank, which had a large concentration of residential real-estate loans, was shuttered by regulators in 2010 as the housing crisis reverberated.

That was a really, really stupid loan. It’s bank managers like these who should be shut out of banking for life.

By early 2011, One West Bank, which had acquired the loans, filed for foreclosure on the property, according to court records. The owners then filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection; Mr. McMonigle left the partnership shortly before the filing, according to Mr. O’Keefe. Corey Gulbranson, a current managing member of the partnership selling the property, said Mr. McMonigle resigned, but would not comment on his reasons.

Abandon ship! Abandon ship!

The auction was held with an undisclosed reserve price, which represented a settlement among the property owners, the lender, and a committee that represents the property’s more than 200 creditors, Mr. O’Keefe said. In addition to the $18.5 million sales price, the buyer will pay a 5% premium to the auction company, Auction.com.

A $925,000 commission? I’m in the wrong business.

After the sale, Mr. Gulbranson said “everyone seemed satisfied with the outcome.” Mr. Gulbranson would not name the other members of the partnership.

Still, the deal must still be finalized in court. The property is still unfinished, and listing agent Rob Giem, of HOM Sotheby’s International Realty, estimates that the buyer will have to put in another $3 million to complete the original plans for the property. He said the home is about “90% to 95%” complete.

$18.5M and it’s not even done. Realistically, any buyer would probably tear out much of McMonigle’s handiwork and renovate the property to their taste. I used to work for a real estate developer who sold his Laguna Beach estate for $35M in 2008. The first thing the new buyer did was gut the flawless interior and redo the whole house.

What can we learn from McMonigle’s wild ride?

John McMonigle had it all, or so he thought. He made large sums of money, but he kept speculating on real estate rather than diversifying his holdings and picking up cashflowing investments. He financed his investments and his lifestyle with ever-increasing debt. If he had made other decisions. If he had bought cashflow properties and invested in dividend paying stocks and bonds, he would have weathered the downfall in much better shape. He may have still lost some wealth, but he would have avoided bankruptcy and a dramatic fall from entitlement from the utter collapse of his real estate empire.

Ponzis who rivaled McMonigle

The former owners of today’s featured property graduated from the John McMonigle school of Ponzi borrowing. The property records are a bit unclear, but the former owners had $1,817,323 in property debt on 11/30/2004. By 11/14/2006, just two years later, they managed to extract $699,077 in HELOC booty. That’s nearly $350,000 per year in tax-free income. That’s livin’ large.

Their $2,166,400 Option ARM blew up — yes, that’s a $2,166,400 Option ARM — and they were allowed to squat for over four years.

Four years squatting in a plush Newport Beach estate.

For their two years of ownership, these people were given $700,000 and allowed to stay rent and payment free for over four years.

I want one of those houses.

Newport Beach Overview

Median home price is $1,084,000. Based on a rental parity value of $783,000, this market is over valued.

Monthly payment affordability has been worsening over the last 2 month(s). Momentum suggests unchanging affordability.

Resale prices on a $/SF basis increased to $505/SF to $538/SF.

Resale prices have been weak for 12 month(s). Price momentum suggests weak prices over the next three months.

Median rental rates increased $175 last month from $$3,108 to $$3,283.

Rents have been slowly rising for 12 month(s). Price momentum suggests slowly rising rents over the next three months.

Market rating = 1

Proprietary OC Housing News home purchase analysis

3 WINGED FOOT Ln Newport Beach, CA 92660

$1,724,900 …….. Asking Price
$1,450,000 ………. Purchase Price
3/28/2002 ………. Purchase Date

$274,900 ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($116,000) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
$158,900 ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
19.0% ………. Gross Percent Change
11.0% ………. Net Percent Change
1.7% ………… Annual Appreciation

Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$1,724,900 …….. Asking Price
$344,980 ………… 20% Down Conventional
4.28% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$1,379,920 …….. Mortgage
$346,675 ………. Income Requirement

$6,813 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$1,495 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$431 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$0 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$217 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$8,956 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

($1,417) ………. Tax Savings
($1,891) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$533 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$236 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$6,416 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$18,749 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$18,749 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$13,799 ………… Interest Points
$344,980 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$396,277 ………. Total Cash Costs
$98,300 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$494,577 ………. Total Savings Needed
——————————————————————————————————————————————-
This property is available for sale via the MLS.
Please contact Shevy Akason, #01836707
949.769.1599……
sales@ochousingnews.com…..

*
*
*

We're sorry, but we couldn't find MLS # P821473 in our database. This property may be a new listing or possibly taken off the market. Please check back again.

19 BURNING TREE Rd, Newport Beach, CA $2,395,000
19 BURNING TREE Rd
0.09 miles
4 bd / 2.5 ba
4,000 Sq. Ft.
3 RUE BIARRITZ, Newport Beach, CA $1,799,000
3 RUE BIARRITZ
0.15 miles
3 bd / 2.5 ba
3,011 Sq. Ft.
20 TURNBERRY Dr, Newport Beach, CA $2,189,000
20 TURNBERRY Dr
0.32 miles
5 bd / 5 ba
3,796 Sq. Ft.
11 CROOKED STICK Dr, Newport Beach, CA $1,749,000
11 CROOKED STICK Dr
0.52 miles
4 bd / 4 ba
3,150 Sq. Ft.
28 RUE GRAND VALLEE, Newport Beach, CA $1,799,000
28 RUE GRAND VALLEE
0.57 miles
3 bd / 3 ba
3,819 Sq. Ft.
1706 PORT SHEFFIELD Pl, Newport Beach, CA $1,895,000
1706 PORT SHEFFIELD Pl
0.61 miles
6 bd / 4 ba
4,000 Sq. Ft.
2201 ALTA VISTA Dr, Newport Beach, CA $1,749,000
2201 ALTA VISTA Dr
0.61 miles
5 bd / 3 ba
3,447 Sq. Ft.
23 EDGEWOOD, Newport Beach, CA $1,374,500
23 EDGEWOOD
0.73 miles
4 bd / 3.5 ba
3,100 Sq. Ft.
1806 PORT STANHOPE Pl, Newport Beach, CA $2,049,900
1806 PORT STANHOPE Pl
0.73 miles
5 bd / 4 ba
3,867 Sq. Ft.
9 SINGLETREE Dr, Newport Beach, CA $1,549,000
9 SINGLETREE Dr
0.76 miles
3 bd / 2.5 ba
2,800 Sq. Ft.


Sign up for the OC Housing News monthly market newsletter.

*
*
*

See the enormous foreclosure pipeline for yourself below. Enter location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."


Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter+1Share on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponhttp://ochousingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/a_housingbubble.jpgDigg ThisSubmit to redditShare via emailPin it on Pinterest

  18 Responses to “McMonigle’s McMansion auctioned for $18.5 million”

  1. Average realtor income is up for the first time in a decade. They finally purged the ranks of enough members to get the average up despite total commission income being about half of the 2006 peak.

    NAR Reports Members’ Income Rose for First Time Since 2002

    For the first time since 2002, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported that income for its members (REALTORS®) increased in 2011.

    “The median income of a REALTOR® rose 2.3 percent to $34,900 in 2011, which is the first overall gain in nine years,” said Paul Bishop, NAR VP of research. “Many REALTORS® have persevered through very difficult market conditions and understand the cyclical nature of the business, but have never had to endure a cycle like the one that is presently waning.”

    Members who are licensed as brokers typically earned $48,400 in 2011, while the median for sales agents was $27,200.

    For NAR members who have 16 or more years of experience, income earned was $50,200. Members working 60 hours a week or more earned $80,900, and 17 percent of all members had a six-figure income.

    “Our members are tapping into resources that give them an edge up on challenging conditions, whether it’s helping a buyer negotiate a distressed sale or find a loan, or in helping a seller with effective marketing,” said NAR President Moe Veissi.

    The typical NAR member has 11 years of experience and works full-time. Most members are women, with 55 percent licensed as brokers and 66 percent sales agents.

    Also, the survey revealed the typical NAR member is 56 years old, and only 2 percent are under 30 years old, while 22 percent are 65 or over.

    Repeat business and referrals proved to be extremely important for members, with repeat business accounting for a median of 19 percent of all activity in 2011 and 38 percent for those with 16 years of experience of more, while referrals added another 20 percent to business activity.

    Most members, 57 percent, are licensed sales agents and 27 percent are brokers.

    As for obstacles, 30 percent of respondents said difficulty in obtaining a mortgage was the greatest barrier.

    Nine out of 10 members are homeowners, and more than half, 53 percent, own at least one residential investment property and 29 percent own at least one commercial property.

    Data on the members was gathered from the 2012 NAR Member Profile.

  2. I feel a great disturbance in Real Estate values as if thousands of OC Beach owners screamed out in terror were suddenly silenced.

  3. The fact that shelter (basic human need) has become a highly speculative instrument based on a fraudulant standard, is all that people really need to understand about why preservation of current values is simply not possible.

    • It seems that everyone involved is determined to perpetuate the fraud. I wonder when it will finally implode of its own weight? I thought this housing bust would be the final purge, but bastions of kool aid intoxication still survive.

  4. Uh oh….

    Morpheus: Switch! Apoc!
    Neo: What is it?
    Trinity: A deja vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when they change something.

    Borrower May Sue after Three Years To Rescind Mortgage Loan, 4th Circuit Rules

    http://www.ballardspahr.com/alertspublications/legalalerts/2012-05-08-borrower-may-sue-after-three-years-to-rescind-mortgage-loan-4th-circuit-rules.aspx

    • This ruling, if not overturned, will cause title insurance rates to rise. Transactions of foreclosed homes will go on, but the risk of a claim years after the fact by an opportunistic former loan owner and attorney will add cost to title insurance to cover this possibility.

  5. A tip o’ the hat for these former owners oversized brass balls. How they were able to do this should make for a best seller: “How it’s done” should be the title. Breathtaking and brazen financial abuse. $350kpy + $40k or so in missed mortgage payments year over year is a nice living wage.

    I know so many people say “it’s the banks that predated upon the weak” but this is a textbook example of how wrongheaded that thinking is.

    • These people made out like bandits — literally. I don’t know what I find more astonishing; that someone got away with this, or that thousands of OC borrowers got away with this.

  6. Dimon keeps his job and his pay….

    The fallout from JPMorgan Chase’s $2 billion trading loss continues. Following yesterday’s departure of three high-ranking execs, including CIO Ina Drew, the focus is now shifting to the firm’s chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon.

    At Tuesday’s annual shareholder meeting in Tampa, there was a proposal on the ballot to strip Dimon of his chairmanship. The measure failed, as was widely expected, and shareholders reaffirmed Dimon’s $23 million 2011 pay package.

    But the ballot is noteworthy because it received 40% of the vote and comes as outside observers, including MIT’s Simon Johnson and Currency Wars author James Rickards, have called for Dimon’s resignation.

    Speaking to shareholders, Dimon reiterated that the trading loss, which has reenergized the debate over bank regulation, was “self-inflicted.”

    Dimon’s vocal opposition to many of the new regulations, most notably the Volcker rule, has animated those on the other side of the debate. Lawmakers in both the House and Senate are calling for hearings on JPMorgan’s $2 billion loss and the SEC opened a preliminary investigation into the trade.

    “Jamie’s problem…is he’s running an institution that’s not only ‘too big to fail’, it’s too big to succeed and too big to manage,” says former New York Governor and NY State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. “The size, commingling of purposes and the lack of management capacity when you get to this scale tells me something is wrong here.”

    In the wake of JPMorgan’s big loss, a number of proposals have resurfaced, including breaking up the big banks by limiting the amount of assets they can hold as a percent of GDP, strengthening the Volcker Rule and reinstating Glass-Steagall.

    Spitzer, currently the host of Viewpoint on Current TV, praised Warren Stephens’ recent WSJ op-ed which called for a cap on bank assets to 5% of GDP vs. 10% currently. But he doesn’t believe there’s a “magic number” for assets or that the size of the bank matters as much as the activities of the bank.

    “They shouldn’t be doing multiple things at same time,” he says. “Being a depository institution at same time you’re playing investment banker, playing prop trader and playing hedge fund. That is the problem.”

    One other structural issue Spitzer would address is the construct of the New York Fed. In perhaps the ultimate example of regulatory capture, the New York Fed is a private institution owned by the very banks it is designed to regulate; along with other bank executives, Dimon currently sits on the NY Fed’s Board of Directors.

    “Jamie is not a bad person…but for chair and CEO of Morgan Chase to be on the board of Fed lobbying and pushing back against the Volcker Rule, people know immediately there’s something wrong with that.”

    • Spitzer: “They shouldn’t be doing multiple things at same time,” he says. “Being a depository institution at same time you’re playing investment banker, playing prop trader and playing hedge fund. That is the problem.”
      ——————————————————————————
      No, the preeminent problem is we’ve reached the point where the fed MUST keep the big banks alive to absorb the ever-expanding treasury issuance.

    • The purpose of Glass-Steagall was to prevent speculative losses like these from taking down our banks. If anything underscores the need to bring back this regulation, it’s this story.

  7. Canada doesn’t allow NINJA loans or option ARMs (or the combination of the two :o ), but they’re in the midst of a bubble. People are stretching their finances to the limit to out-bid one another:

    http://www.npr.org/2012/05/15/152275466/canadas-housing-market-booms-experts-see-trouble

    • Canada’s housing bubble isn’t as bad as ours, and it’s a direct result of the lower interest rates needed to revive the economy from the recession caused by our housing bubble. Once borrowing became cheap, prices started to rise quickly, and that was the precipitating factor of a bubble.

      Canada will be the case study of an interest-rate driven housing bubble. It will be interesting to see what happens in Canada after rates go up. My guess is they will cram about 10 years of appreciation into two years, then they will face a decade of house price stagnation as interest rates creep back up.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

The information being provided by CARETS (CLAW, CRISNet MLS, DAMLS, CRMLS, i-Tech MLS, and/or VCRDS) is for the visitor's personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties visitor may be interested in purchasing.

Any information relating to a property referenced on this web site comes from the Internet Data Exchange (IDX) program of CARETS. This web site may reference real estate listing(s) held by a brokerage firm other than the broker and/or agent who owns this web site.

The accuracy of all information, regardless of source, including but not limited to square footages and lot sizes, is deemed reliable but not guaranteed and should be personally verified through personal inspection by and/or with the appropriate professionals. The data contained herein is copyrighted by CARETS, CLAW, CRISNet MLS, DAMLS, CRMLS, i-Tech MLS and/or VCRDS and is protected by all applicable copyright laws. Any dissemination of this information is in violation of copyright laws and is strictly prohibited.

CARETS, California Real Estate Technology Services, is a consolidated MLS property listing data feed comprised of CLAW (Combined LA/Westside MLS), CRISNet MLS (Southland Regional AOR), DAMLS (Desert Area MLS), CRMLS (California Regional MLS), i-Tech MLS (Glendale AOR/Pasadena Foothills AOR) and VCRDS (Ventura County Regional Data Share).

Date last updated: 5/20/13 11:59 AM PDT

This IDX solution is (c) Diverse Solutions 2013.