Contact Shevy Akason at (949) 769-1599

Shevy (at)

Author Archive: Irvine Renter

Eventually Millennials will buy houses, bubble-era buyers won't be underwater, and the housing market will finally recover. Since early 2012 when housing prices stopped going down, I characterized the price rally as a reflation of the old housing bubble rather than a price recovery. IMO, the crash was the price recovery because the prices that preceded the crash were a bubble with no tether to fundamental values. The price crash restored market prices to values supportable by income and rent. However, most people refuse to accept this reality, particularly deeply underwater homeowners who dismiss the idea that they erred when buying during the bubble. Due to psychological anchoring, most homeowners cling to the illusion that peak housing bubble prices were…[READ MORE]

Rents and resale prices only rise faster than incomes due to supply shortages during periods when job growth is strong. It costs too much to live in California because the chronic shortages of housing supply inflates California house prices and rents. Starting in the 1970s with regulations like CEQA, California began to restrict growth. This inhibited builders and developers from bringing new product to market to meet demand in many areas. When any commodity is in short supply, prices tend to rise; houses are no exception. There are not enough houses to go around, so people substitute down in quality to obtain a place to live. This downward substitution effect lifts house prices at every level of the housing ladder…[READ MORE]

As one of the chief architects of the housing bubble, Angelo R. Mozilo deserved prison time and loss of wealth for his nefarious deeds. Most people don't understand how the housing bubble was actually inflated. Many incorrectly believe the degradation of home lending standards caused a surge of demand that bid prices up to unsustainable levels. While that's partially true, that isn't the full story. While mortgage standards were nearly eliminated, and millions of unqualified borrowers were allowed to buy homes, that isn't why prices got so high. If bankers eliminated lending standards today, but used conventionally amortizing 30-year loans, prices would go up a little as people substituted downward in quality to obtain housing, but overall house prices would…[READ MORE]

When asset values rise and stay up, that's considered prosperity. When asset values rise and then fall, that's considered a bubble. What will happen with housing tomorrow? Nobody wants to overpay for a house. From 2006 to 2011, anyone who bought a house anywhere in the United States paid more than they would have if they had waited until March of 2012. Of course, it isn't practical to time the bottom tick of any financial market, so prudent buyers with an understanding of value, look at key benchmarks to determine when prices are too high or too low. The benchmark I favor is rental parity. Rental parity represents a crossover point where renting and owning have an equal monthly cost.…[READ MORE]

Previous loan modifications and old HELOCs face resetting to higher rates and recasting to full amortization likely leading to further loan modification. In the heat of financial distress during the depths of the recession, many people asked their banks for unilateral loan term modifications in favor of the borrower. Ordinarily, banks would never consider such a request, but since so many borrowers were distressed, and since foreclosure would result in a loss of original capital, many lenders offered these distressed borrowers deals to keep them paying. Borrowers thought they were getting a deal. Many enjoyed reduced payments, and since fees, charges, fines, and other garbage was clandestinely added to the loan balance, borrowers only saw the benefit and ignored the…[READ MORE]

Ireland chose to preserve the unsustainable mortgage debt from their housing bubble a decade ago. As a result, nearly half the adult population of Ireland are lifelong debt slaves. When the service on existing debt exceeds the borrower's capacity to make payments, the borrower is insolvent. The limit of insolvency is also known as the Ponzi limit because once this threshold is crossed, the only way borrowers pay their debts is through additional infusions of borrowed money. Every dollar loaned to a borrower beyond the threshold of solvency, beyond the Ponzi limit, is a dollar lost by the lender -- unless lenders find "innovative solutions" to preserve the debt for another day, which is what Irish lenders accomplished when they…[READ MORE]

New supply in Irvine blunts rent increases while the rest of Orange County experiences rapid rent growth. It's no secret that we lack sufficient housing to meet demand in Orange County. The lack of supply causes people to put ever-larger percentages of their income toward housing, bidding up rent. At the low end of the housing ladder, it forces families to double and triple up in poor quality housing. Many people leave the area for lack of housing. While there are signs that politicians may finally move to do something about the problem (See: Governor Brown’s housing affordability proposal could actually succeed), any real relief will be years and years away. In the meantime, rents keep going up faster than…[READ MORE]

Lenders are supposed to be the adults in lending transactions. They have superior knowledge and experience, and it's their money at risk; therefore, they should bear more responsibility when things go wrong. People of good conscious must apportion blame for the housing bubble appropriately to craft public policy to prevent a recurrence or provide financial relief. As with any public policy issue, activists on both sides polarized the issue based on their world view. Activists on the Left portray the evil banks as taking advantage of hapless borrowers thus entitling these borrowers mortgage relief or absolution for strategic default. Self-serving borrowers side with the political left because they want free money in the form of debt relief. Activists on the…[READ MORE]

realtors are supposed to be experts and marketing. Sellers pay them 6% of the value of their homes for this expertise -- or lack thereof. Although many realtors are upstanding business people with strong ethics and empathy for their clients, many others are not. Collectively, the association that represents realtors is a dysfunctional, highly-manipulative group. Since I began writing about real estate matters nearly 10 years ago, I refused to capitalize the letter "r" in realtor. Such capitalization would be a sign of respect I don't believe the association warrants. In short, I think realtor associations suck. The association in Orange County sued me once, so perhaps that biases my judgement. (See: OC realtors seek to silence free speech by…[READ MORE]

Full-service brokerage may be the worst way to sell real estate, except for all the others. The Internet obliterated travel agents. It was easy to ordinary people to disintermediate travel agents, and as it turned out, obtaining advice on travel from someone who's been there isn't very valuable. So do real estate agents continue to thrive? What value do they provide beyond the functions people can perform on the Internet? Some people — many people — can benefit from having an agent as a leader and guide them to a closing. Yesterday, we explored the for-sale-by-owner option and today we are going to look at utilizing a full-commission broker. The pros of using a full-service brokerage Once an owner has…[READ MORE]




In Memoriam: Tony Bliss 1966-2012